RSS

2012 saw end to four years of weaker sales activity

 

 
Calgary, Jan. 2, 2013 – Residential real estate sales in the city of Calgary ended the year on a high note, with sales volume up 15 per cent in 2012 compared to 2011, and benchmark prices up five per cent.
 
“Calgary’s housing market has finally started to recover,” said Ann-Marie Lurie, CREB®’s chief economist. “While prices remain shy of the highs recorded in 2007, this is a move in the right direction.”

Much of the sustainable recovery is fuelled from the growth in the energy sector, spilling over into all aspects of our economy, including housing, Lurie said. “There is no question employment and migration growth has supported housing demand, a trend that is expected to continue this year, albeit at a slower pace.”

The single-family market sales growth outpaced increases in the total condominium market within city limits. Single-family sales rose by 15 per cent in 2012 compared to 2011. New listings did not keep pace, declining by seven per cent over the same period. This has significantly reduced the inventory of single-family homes in the market, pushing prices up.

“Consumers in the market were looking for value, and, if a home was priced right based on a longer term view of their housing needs, they were buying,” said 2012 CREB® President Bob Jablonski.|

The price spread is expected to narrow as balanced market conditions support further price growth, he said. But in most communities, prices remain lower than 2007 levels.

The unadjusted single-family benchmark price was $434,800 for the month of December, 8.7-per-cent higher than 2011. On average, single-family prices are up by seven per cent for the year, and remain two per cent below peak pricing in 2007.

Condominium sales are improving, as lower supply levels and rising prices in the single-family market drove consumers to explore alternatives. Sales in the apartment and townhouse sector recorded annual increases of 12 and 16 per cent, respectively. Meanwhile, listings are declining in both sectors, keeping both markets in balanced conditions. Price growth has not been at the same pace as what was recorded in the single-family sector.

Condominium apartment benchmark prices totalled 248,700 in December, a 5.4 per cent increase over 2011. Annual average benchmark increases were two per cent, significantly lower than the five per cent increase in the annual average price.

The average price increase is misleading, as there were several multimillion-dollar condominium sales in 2012 that skewed figures up. With more sales occurring at the higher end of the spectrum, average and median prices are trending higher than the benchmark, which represents price growth for the same type of property.

“Calgary’s 2013 housing sector growth will ease both in terms of sales and price growth, differing from the declines expected on a national level,” Lurie said.

Calgary’s housing market did not recover at the same pace as other Canadian centres, and 2012 was the first time resale sales returned to more normal levels of activity, she said.

“It is expected that continued weakness in the natural gas sector, combined with the more cautious expansion approach in the oil sector, will persist this year. While economic activity will be strong enough to support moderate housing growth, the notion of an overheated housing market in 2013 is unlikely, given the economic backdrop.”
Read

There is nothing more stressful than selling your house, especially selling in the Winter when the roads are slippery, views are blanketed in snow and trees are bare. But not everyone can wait until the spring market when a flurry of homes bombard the market!  For this same reason, this is one advantage of selling in the colder months of the year!

 

Buyers looking for a property at this time are more serious and tend not to waste time sitting on the fence. They will only view the houses they are serious about.  After all, who wants to spend their days driving around on slippery roads, getting in and out of the cold, removing dirty footwear and bulky jackets?  So if your property is one of the lucky ones that have a showing scheduled, be sure it is up to par. 

 

Here are some tips to help you sell your house this winter:

 

1. Clear snow and ice from driveway and walkways around your home - This is the top tip from agents.  This makes the prospective buyers feel comfortable when walking into your property.  It also shows the house is well cared for and maintained, both interior AND exterior. 

 

2. Make it warm and cozy - It's cold outside.  Make the entrance to your home an inviting one by placing candles near the entrance, maybe a nice wreath on the door and turn up the heat.  Have a mat setup for buyers to place their dirty shoes and then walk onto a nice clean surface.  If you are leaving for the showing and coming back right after, turn on the fireplace for them and have some warm cookies and maybe a hot chocolate dispenser to warm them up during their tour of your home.  This will make them feel more at home and comfortable - something they will never forget!

 

3. Take advantage of glows from lamp - There is something warm and inviting about looking at a property from a distance in the winter and seeing the yellow glow of a lamp shining through the window.  The yellow glow offers a cozy ambiance that is both calming and warm.  So make sure you keep all those lamps on for the showing.

 

4. Play soft music in the background - Create an atmosphere by playing soothing classical music or Christmas music very quietly in the background.

 

5. Make it festive - Greet potential buyers with holiday flowers, scents and set the table for an elegant dinner.  But don't go overboard with the decorations - you don't want it to look tacky!

 

6. Consider the area - In some areas of the city, winter weather can actually be a selling point! If you live near COP for example, make note of the fact that you are just minutes from skiing at COP or approximately an hour to Banff and Sunshine.

 

Please feel free to contact me anytime if you have any questions.

 

By Mona Kapoor

 

Read

Are you planning a home renovation? Chances are your neighbor is, according to a recent survey by Houzz.com. In the next two years, 72 per cent of Canadian homeowners surveyed are planning to decorate or redecorate, 40 per cent are building an addition or remodeling, and another 11 per cent are planning to have a custom home built.

 

What Do Kitchen & Bath Renovations Cost?


What are Canadian homeowners spending to improve their kitchens and bathrooms? Nationally, Canadians are spending an average of $23,300 Canadian to upgrade their kitchen cabinets, appliances and workspace. Bathrooms are smaller investments, with Canadians investing an average of $9,100 to remodel everything from plumbing fixtures to tile and lighting. Americans are spending an average of $27,000 U.S. on kitchens, and $11,300 on bathrooms.

 

These averages however don't reflect the regional diversity when it comes to these projects. Calgary residents are investing the most in their kitchens, spending an average of $32,200, while Vancouver homeowners are spending $22,200, almost $10,000 less and slightly below average. Spending outside of major metropolitan areas average $19,500. Montreal homeowners are the biggest spenders on bathrooms, investing $11,500 on average, and Toronto is close behind at $10,500. While big spenders on kitchens, Calgary homeowners are spending the least on their bathrooms, averaging $7,500.

 

The survey also found that remodeling kitchens and bathrooms are top priority for Canadian homeowners, and also for their American counterparts. In the next two years, 50 per cent of Canadian homeowners on Houzz are planning to remodel their bathrooms, and 48 per cent are renovating a kitchen. This compares favorably to the 33 per cent of homeowners surveyed who remodeled their kitchen in the last five years, and the 40 per cent who remodeled a bathroom.

 

But Canadian homeowners are approaching their projects differently than homeowners in the U.S.; not just what they spend but also how they get it done.

 

Popular Projects

While kitchen remodeling and bathroom remodeling are #1 and #2 on Canadian project lists, what other priorities are Canadians planning? In the next two years, Canadians are also planning to take on flooring (44 per cent), replacing windows and doors (32 per cent), living room/family room additions or remodels (31 per cent), and patios and landscapes (31 per cent). These priorities are similar to those in the U.S., though Americans are focusing significantly more on their patio and landscape projects than on living room/family room renovations.

Regionally, Calgary residents surveyed are planning more custom homes and additions, as compared to other Canadians surveyed. 17 per cent built a custom home in the last five years, vs. 12 per cent for all Canadian homeowners on Houzz, and 49 per cent built an addition. 59 per cent of Calgary residents are planning a custom home build or remodel/addition in the next two years, as compared with 46 per cent of homeowners surveyed in Montreal and Toronto

Hands-on or Hiring Help?


Canadian homeowners on Houzz like to take a hands-on approach to their projects, and at a significantly higher rate than their U.S. counterparts. In fact, 76 per cent of Canadian respondents report doing some or all of the work themselves. They do however recognize when they need professional help. In the last five years, 61 per cent of respondents report hiring a general contractor, 50 per cent a carpet or flooring professional, 30 per cent a kitchen and bath professional, 24 percent an interior designer, 21 per cent a landscape professional, and 18 per cent and architect.

 

Regionally, Montreal residents surveyed are more likely than other Canadians to hire help for their projects, and to go over budget. They are also more likely to hire an architect than other Canadians. Edmonton residents by contrast are the least likely to hire an architect. Fifty-seven per cent of Montreal residents reported going over budget on their most recent remodeling project, a significantly larger group than the 44 per cent average for all Canadian respondents.

 

New Motivations & Financing Approaches


Most surprising among the survey findings are the motivations behind these projects. Even in the current economy, Canadians are remodeling to please themselves, not the next owner. When asked what is important to them when taking on their next project, 83 per cent of Canadian Houzz users cited improving the look, feel, flow and layout of their home, while only 56 per cent cited home value. Increasing home value, while second priority, is still more important to Canadians than Americans surveyed, only 47 per cent of who cited return on investment as important.

 

Canadians are still taking a conservative fiscal approach to projects; when it comes to financing, Canadians as a whole are saying "no" to loans -- only 14 per cent are planning to take out a line of credit. But they aren't willing to wait to renovate; 60 per cent say they will cut back on vacations, car purchases or other big-ticket items rather than delay a remodeling project.

 

Read More: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/liza-hausman/canada-renovation_b_1982130.html

Read

The province of Ontario has gone from criticizing the oilsands to increasing its efforts to capture their economic benefits.

 

Brad Duguid, Ontario's minister for economic development, says he plans to increase his department's attention to Alberta by adding more staff to deal with trade issues.

 

"I think we have a recognition that our relationship could be stronger. I think that we want to now move forward with the knowledge that the oilsands are important to Ontario's economy," Duguid told The Canadian Press on Wednesday.

 

He said he understands the value of the oilsands to Ontario business and estimated that value at $63 billion over the next 25 years.

 

"It may be a time for Ontario to increase our presence in the province of Alberta in terms of our business supports here," he said from Calgary. "We may want to look at having some more presence here in terms of staffing."

 

The Ontario government doesn't currently have an office in Alberta. A bureaucrat at the Ontario legislature spends part of his time dealing with Alberta files.

 

"The intent is move that to a full-time contact so that we've got more of a personal contact here — a good liaison between the business community in Ontario and Alberta."

 

A spokeswoman for Duguid's office later clarified the Ontario government is looking at many ways to boost its profile in Alberta, which may or may not include opening an actual office in the province.

 

Duguid said it's time to help businesses in his province that are looking for oilpatch opportunities and Alberta companies that are looking for skilled labour.

 

"There's a recognition that that's important to Ontario's economy and it makes sense to look at ways we can work closer together, both in providing opportunities for our respective businesses and at the same to work together as governments," Duguid said.

 

Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty said earlier this year that the booming energy sector was driving up the Canadian dollar and hurting the manufacturing and export sectors in Central Canada.

 

Federal NDP Leader Tom Mulcair has made similar comments. He has said the oilsands are artificially inflating the Canadian dollar and hollowing out the country's manufacturing sector. He calls it the definition of Dutch disease — a reference to the Netherlands and how a natural gas find in that country led to declines in manufacturing in the 1960s.

 

Duguid said his government wants to move past that debate.

 

"We're aware that there was a lot said about those comments. We just want to move forward."

 

Stronger links between Canada's largest provincial economy and its fastest-growing one would be good for the whole country, said Duguid.

 

Source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2012/10/10/ontario-alberta-trade.html

Read

Homeowners who are planning to move up often wrestle with the dilemma: "Should we sell first or buy first?" You'll find plenty of agents advising you to buy before you sell, but that's rarely in your best interest. It's in the agent's best interest because if you buy, you will need to sell, and the agent will be guaranteed two sales, regardless of how much it cost you to do it this way.

 

If you decide to sell first and then buy but, say, your home doesn't sell or it attracts very low offers that you do not want to accept, the agent will get nothing. Think about it.

 

Of course, which comes first, the chicken or the egg, depends on the market -- is it a buyer's or a seller's market -- and your personal motivation. However, for most sellers and buyers, the smart thing to do is to sell before you buy.

Reasons to Sell First and Then Buy

  • Ability to Negotiate.

    By selling first, you have the luxury of time. You don't have to take the first offer that comes along because you already have a place to live. It's called your home.

  • Higher Sales Price.

    Sellers who aren't under pressure to sell often obtain higher sales prices because buyers realize the sellers are not desperate. Nothing yells "discount your offer" like a listing that reads: "seller motivated, bought another."

  • Contingent on Concurrent Closing.

    By making the sale of your home contingent on closing concurrently with your new purchase, you have basically said to the buyer, "If I can't find the home I want to buy, I'm under no obligation to sell to you." You don't have to name the property address. You can simply state: "This sale contingent on closing concurrently with the purchase of seller's replacement home."

    In fairness, a smart buyer's agent won't let a buyer sign a contract with a contingency clause like that; however, I get away with inserting that clause because few agents understand its implication.

  • Contingency Period.

    OK, let's say the buyer's agent is smart enough to strike a concurrent closing clause from the contract. The next best thing to ask for is a time period during which you are free to look for a replacement home. A contingency period will give you the right to cancel the contract during that time period if you so choose, which can range, on average, from 7 to 21 days.

  • Renting After Closing.

    Some sellers who want to take their time to find the perfect home, that one-in-a-million, will often opt to rent after closing. If the buyer doesn't require immediate occupancy, the seller might rent back their own home for the amount of the buyer's new mortgage payment. Or the seller might move out, put their belongings into storage and rent a furnished, short-term apartment.

Reasons to Buy First and Then Sell

  • It's a Seller's Market.

    When the number of buyers are many and inventory is reduced, homes generally sell within days of hitting the market. In this instance, there is little risk in buying first and selling second. However, few sellers will accept a contingent offer. Since these sellers will not accept a sale-contingent offer, you could be stuck owning two residences until your home sells. On top of that, you will pay top dollar for your new home, especially if you end up bidding in a multiple offer situation.

  • Deal is Too Good to Wait.

    Sometimes, regardless of the marketplace, a home will come on the market at a price that is too good to pass up. Perhaps the sellers are getting divorced, need to pay medical bills or one of them has a gambling addiction with debts to pay; the point is the sellers are extremely motivated to sell. Before word spreads across town, you might want to be the first offer on the table.

    In this instance, it makes sense to buy before you sell because the money you make walking into the deal is worth making double payments until your home sells. When the deal is that good, pull out all your negotiating tricks.

  • It's Your Dream Home.

    This is an emotional decision. As much as many buyers might want to be logical and analytical, people who let their hearts rule are not. Real estate is an emotional business anyway, so those who fixate on owning a certain type of home may as well buy it when they first spot it. For some, money is no object. Fortunately, these types of buyers rarely look back, but keep their sights set on the horizon, on moving forward, and they don't regret making emotional decisions. They want what they want, and they get what they want.

Whatever you decide, please contact me first!  I can help you decide what is best for your situation!

Read

Could Canada could slip into the same traps that hurt the U.S. economy in 2008-09? Some are sounding the alarm bells – at least on the housing front.

 

Clearly, Ottawa is worried about the debt levels being carried by the average household. Witness Finance Minister Jim Flaherty’s recent announcement that he was changing the maximum amortization on a government-backed mortgage to 25 years from 30 years.

 

The announcement was greeted with mixed reviews, including loud criticism from those who worry younger generations will have a significantly harder time being able to afford first homes.

 

But reducing the limit for mortgage amortization is not only good public policy – cooling the speculative real-estate sector without killing the home-construction industry – it is good for homeowners in general. Here’s why.

 

U.S. banks and lending institutions took part in two inappropriate activities in the U.S. housing and mortgage market prior to 2008, both passively allowed by the government in the hope of assisting low-income Americans to own their own homes.

 

First, banks were offering mortgages with low introductory interest rates that would later (one to three years later) rise to higher ultimate rates. Second, banks were offering mortgages at very high ratios to the value of the house (even up to 100 per cent). This was all fine – for both banks and home owners – so long as incomes and house values rose.

 

It all came to a thunderous halt in 2008.

 

As homeowners’ mortgages with low introductory rates came up for renewal, many could not afford the new higher payments that went along with the higher ultimate rates. Americans had to walk away from their loans, and therefore, from their homes – in droves.

 

At the same time, for those who had leveraged a very high percentage of their home value in their mortgage, the falling house prices meant that they now had a mortgage with an outstanding value that was larger than the value of the house. So, they too, simply walked away, handing the keys to their homes to the lending institutions.

 

This all snowballed into the exponential fall in American home values in 2008-09, and the accompanying loss in value of the mortgage assets held by the lending institutions – a very important piece of the global financial crisis.

 

In Canada, we are fortunate that our successive governments have always forced higher down payments for homes here than those required in the U.S. With the new limits on the amortization period, our government wants to dodge the American crisis. This is prudent, and safeguards the economy in general. But the new limits are also good for the individual home owner.

 

Let’s do some arithmetic. Consider a $100,000 mortgage. (Most mortgages are much larger, but you can get to the answer to your personal situation easily by multiplying by the size of your mortgage.) I will assume today’s five-year mortgage rate of 5.24 per cent.

 

If you take out a mortgage to be paid off over 30 years, your monthly payment will be $548.10. Over 30 years, you will pay a total of $197,316, including $97,316 in interest. If, however, you choose the 25-year mortgage, your monthly payment is $595.34 ($47.24 more a month). Over 25 years, you will pay a total of $178,602 – $78,602 in interest, just 80 per cent of the interest you would pay on the 30-year mortgage. Further, you will own the house debt-free five years sooner.

 

If interest rates rise, the arithmetic becomes more dramatic.

 

Consider a $500,000 mortgage at 6 per cent. If you choose the 30-year mortgage, you pay $2,974.12 a month for 30 years, a total of $1,070,683, including $570,683 in interest. Using a 25-year mortgage requires monthly payments of $3,199.03 ($224.91 more a month) for a total payment of $959,709, including $459,709 in interest.

In other words, for an extra $7.39 a day, you can own your house five years sooner and pay a whopping $110, 974 less in interest.

 

If a home buyer cannot afford an extra $7.39 a day in mortgage payments, should they be in the market? Aren’t we all really better off with the shorter amortization period?

 

The bottom line: The impact of this new legislation is less pain than pragmatism. For once, we should be thankful to our big brother in Ottawa.

 

Source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/commentary/good-for-homeowners-and-the-economy/article4415948/?cmpid=rss1

Read

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty announced new rules for Canadian mortgages on Monday that he said will "protect the stability of the economy."

 

Flaherty's announcement comes on the heels of a recent warning from the Bank of Canada that Canadians' domestic debt burden is the highest on record.

 

The Monday announcement included three new rules for the mortgage industry that will come into effect March 18:

 

  • Mortgage amortization periods will be reduced from 35 years to 30 years.
  • The maximum amount Canadians can borrow to refinance their mortgages will be lowered from 90 per cent to 85 per cent of the value of their homes.
  • The government will withdraw its insurance backing on lines of credit secured on homes, such as home equity lines of credit.

"Taxpayers should not bear any risk related to consumer debt products unrelated to house purchases. Those risks should be managed by the financial institutions that originate and offer these practices," Flaherty said Monday.

 

It is the third time in three years that Flaherty has tightened credit rules while interest rates remain historically low.

The new restrictions are intended to ensure that Canadians don't slip into unmanageable debt, which could throw the economic recovery off the rails, he said.

 

"Today's measures are about our government continuing to protect the stability of the economy by ensuring lenders' practices are sustainable, which will in turn ensure Canadian families have increasingly secure and sustainable home ownership."

 

Flaherty targeted home-equity loans and lines of credit because some Canadians were using the money on consumer goods rather than to build equity into their homes, he said.

 

"They are used to buy boats and cars and big-screen TVs, and that's not the business mortgage insurance was designed for," he said. "Our measures will help improve the financial situation of households in Canada."

 

The Bank of Canada announced earlier this month that Canadians' domestic debt burdens had hit the highest levels on record. The bank said the ratio of household debt to disposable income has reached 148 per cent -- which is higher than in the United States.

 

The International Monetary Fund also recently warned that household debt is the number one risk to the Canadian economy. Canadian household debt is now at $1.4 trillion, while mortgage delay payments have increased by 50 per cent.

 

However, Flaherty maintained that Canada is not facing a debt crisis.

 

"We are responding to a situation that could develop," he told reporters.

 

"It's obvious we could have gone farther. We have not touched down-payment requirements, for example. This is intentional. We are trying to strike the right balance so that we do not create any sort of shock in the market, or any sort of dramatic pressure in the market."

 

Phil Soper, president and chief executive at Royal LePage, said the new measures "shouldn't have a significant impact on the housing industry itself."

 

"Policymakers and the minister needed to put an exclamation mark behind the concerns related to rising household debt and they did that with this," he told CTV's Power Play.

 

Jim Murphy of the Canadian Association of Mortgage Brokers agreed.

 

"The government is trying to find a balance between increasing household debt while at the same time trying to keep a healthy housing market," he said on Power Play.

 

The measures are equivalent to boosting interest rates by half a percent but are more specific, according to Douglas Porter, deputy chief economist at The Bank of Montreal.

 

"This is way a way of not affecting a lot of innocent bystanders, including the manufacturing and the tourism sector, by putting more upward pressure on the Canadian dollar," Porter told The Canadian Press.

 

Meanwhile Avery Shenfeld, chief economist at CIBC, said the new rules will have only a "marginal" effect on mortgage lending.

 

"It's the difference between somebody borrowing $200,000 and $180,000 or 190,000," he said. "More dramatic would have been to raise the down payment, which would have a larger impact on people's ability to finance their first home."

 

BNN's Michael Kane said Flaherty is clearly concerned that Canada's low lending rates have inspired people to borrow more than they would normally.

 

"What he is saying, and he reiterated this two or three times, is we see Canadians borrowing to the max at record low interest rates, and what he is afraid of is that when interest rates to start to rise...then you can get into a dangerous situation where you can't pay down your mortgage," Kane told CTV's Canada AM.

 

Source: http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Canada/20110117/flaherty-mortgage-rules-110117/#ixzz1yXWV4Rkx

Read

Looking to purchase some commercial real estate in Canada but unsure where to start? Follow along as we count down Canada’s top investment cities, according to a report by the Real Estate Investment Network.

Factors such as transportation upgrades, rate of increase for regional income, population growth, jobs and RBC Affordability Index Hot Zone (between 25-35%) were all factors in the cities’ ranking.

 

CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE LIST OF CANADA'S TOP INVESTMENT CITIES

Read
Categories:   Acadia, Calgary Real Estate | alberta | atb financial | Auburn Bay, Calgary Real Estate | banff springs hotel | Beltline, Calgary Real Estate | Bonavista Downs, Calgary Real Estate | Bridlewood, Calgary Real Estate | calgary | calgary economy | calgary house for sale | calgary housing | calgary retail sales | Canada econ | canada economy | canada mortgage | canadian spending | celebrations | Chaparral, Calgary Real Estate | cir realty | Copperfield, Calgary Real Estate | Cranston, Calgary Real Estate | Crescent Heights, Calgary Real Estate | Crossfield, Crossfield Real Estate | Downtown Commercial Core, Calgary Real Estate | Downtown West End, Calgary Real Estate | Erinwoods, Calgary Real Estate | Evergreen, Calgary Real Estate | ghosts | halloween | Harvest Hills, Calgary Real Estate | Haysboro, Calgary Real Estate | holidays | Huntington Hills, Calgary Real Estate | Inglewood, Calgary Real Estate | Legacy, Calgary Real Estate | Mahogany, Calgary Real Estate | McKenzie Lake, Calgary Real Estate | Millrise, Calgary Real Estate | mls | mortgage canada | mortgage rules | New Brighton, Calgary Real Estate | Nolan Hill, Calgary Real Estate | october 31 | Panorama Hills, Calgary Real Estate | Pineridge, Calgary Real Estate | prairies | real estate | real estate calgary | real estate market | Riverbend, Calgary Real Estate | Scenic Acres, Calgary Real Estate | selling your home, selling home in winter | Shawnessy, Calgary Real Estate | Silver Springs, Calgary Real Estate | Silverado, Calgary Real Estate | Somerset, Calgary Real Estate | South Calgary, Calgary Real Estate | Springbank Hill, Calgary Real Estate | Walden, Calgary Real Estate
Data is supplied by Pillar 9™ MLS® System. Pillar 9™ is the owner of the copyright in its MLS®System. Data is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed accurate by Pillar 9™.
The trademarks MLS®, Multiple Listing Service® and the associated logos are owned by The Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) and identify the quality of services provided by real estate professionals who are members of CREA. Used under license.